| PROJECT TITLE | PROJ. NO. | PROJECT CLASSIFICATION | |||||||
| MTWRF Reactor Replacement (Schreiber) | |||||||||
| DESCRIPTION: | |||||||||
| The Schreiber Process produces continuous anoxic and anaerobic zones within the reactor. The wetted surfaces of the Schreiber have been deplating for several years. This has exposed the raw steel to the corrosive environment. The Schreiber Corporation has acknowledged the deplating of the galvanizing occured prematurely and they proposed a material replacement cost of 25% for stainless steel. It is not known at this time if this process will be utilized in the ENR upgrade of the plant. If it is than all wetted steel structures would have to be replaced. | |||||||||
| PLANNING JUSTIFICATION: | |||||||||
| If the Schreiber process is used with the ENR and plant expansion, then the wetted surfaces will have to be replaced. | |||||||||
| LOCATION: | |||||||||
| All Election Districts throughout the County | |||||||||
| PROJECT TITLE | PROJ. NO. | PROJECT CLASSIFICATION | |||||||
| COST CENTER | Sewer | Water | Total Project | ||||||
| Planning (15%) | $77,100 | $0 | $77,100 | ||||||
| Engineer / Design | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| Land Acquisition | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| Construction | $514,000 | $0 | $514,000 | ||||||
| Overhead(10%) | $59,110 | $0 | $59,110 | ||||||
| Other | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||
| Total | $650,210 | $0 | $650,210 | ||||||
| Service Area Expansion% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||
| Capital Facilities Expansion% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||
| Upgrade/Replacement% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||
| Other Sources% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||
| Spent | Five Year Capital Improvement Budget | Total | |||||||
| APPROPRIATION | FY07 | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | Project | ||
| SEWER | $0 | $0 | $0 | $650,000 | $0 | $0 | $650,000 | ||
| WATER | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| TOTAL COSTS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $650,000 | $0 | $0 | $650,000 | ||
| FUNDING SOURCE | Spent | Five Year Capital Improvement Budget | Total | ||||||
| FUNDS: | FY07 | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | Project | ||
| LOANS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| BONDS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| GRANTS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| NAVY | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| RESERVES | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| COUNTY FUNDS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| STATE FUNDS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| FEDERAL FUNDS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| OTHER SOURCES | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| specify: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| TOTAL FUNDS | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| CONTINUATION SHEET | |||||||||
| PROJECT TITLE | PROJ. NO. | PROJECT CLASSIFICATION | |||||||
| OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS: | |||||||||
| DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2007 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN: | |||||||||
| . | |||||||||
| IMPACT ON ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET | |||||||||
| INCREMENTAL OPERATING COSTS | |||||||||
| DESCRIPTION | FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | FY 2013 | |||
| STAFFING -FTEs | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| CONTRACTED SERVICES | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| SUPPLIES & MATERIALS | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| UTILITIES | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| OTHER (describe significant items) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| TOTAL COSTS | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
| DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: | |||||||||
| OTHER IMPACT ON OPERATIONS/OPERATING BUDGET: | |||||||||