Public Meeting Minutes

MINUTES

ST. MARY’S COUNTY METROPOLITAN COMMISSION

REGULAR MEETING

DECEMBER 13, 2007

 

The meeting commenced at 1:00 p.m. In attendance were Commissioners Taylor, Werner, St. Clair, Lancaster, Hanson, Owen and Oliver, representing Captain Glen Ives; staff members King, Frederick, Shick, Cullins, and Sullivan. Also in attendance were Jacki Meiser, General Counsel, Susan Harvey (Recorder); and Messrs. Phillips and Wise of Breton Bay.

 

MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA

 

Commissioner St. Clair made a motion to move up the “Breton Bay Golf Course, Board of Directors’ Discussion” to immediately succeed ”Approval of Minutes”; and to approve the Agenda. Commissioner Lancaster seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

 

Commissioner Werner moved to approve Minutes of Regular Session dated November 15, 2007. Commissioner Owen seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

BRETON BAY GOLF COURSE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ DISCUSSION

 

Commissioner Taylor invited Messrs. Phillips and Wise to address the Board at this time.

 

  • Mr. Phillips detailed the history of the Golf Course’s efforts to construct additional housing, and to satisfy its irrigation problems. Because preliminary tests at a specific location on the Golf Course have proved that it might not be suitable for the installation of a Rapid Infiltration Basin (RIB); other alternatives are now being considered. He noted his appreciation of Mr. King’s cooperation in this regard over the years; however, he requested the Commission’s further help with the County in expediting this process. He finally justified why Breton Bay PUD should have first priority in the event that there is sufficient capacity to handle additional hookups.

 

Mr. King subsequently presented the Commission’s position on the issue as follows:

 

  • 44 houses have been permitted to hook up to the treatment plant at the request of the Health Department and MDE. This has resulted in the official capacity being exceeded. Therefore, no additional connections will be permitted, as the capacity of the plant has already been over-allocated.
  • He regrets that the Golf Course’s project to solve its irrigation problems was not successful, and remarked that Compton is not a growth area. However, he believes that, (a) utilization of the new basins installed on the RIB site purchased from Dr. Samadi, (b) more intensive use of the spray irrigation site, and (c) conversion of the storage lagoons back to a treatment pond, will allow service to the existing houses in the Compton area with failed, or failing systems, without any additional improvements other than installation of a further RIB on the edge of Rte. 243. He stressed that, apart from this possibility, there is no further capacity available.

 

Dr. Wise stated that the reasons he initially chose to settle in Breton Bay revolved around the facts that there were public water and sewer opportunities, and that it is a consolidated neighborhood in a designated neighborhood conservation district with available PUD’s. He noted the various lost opportunities he has witnessed over the years, and stated that Breton Bay Recreation is now creating an opportunity for families to live in St. Mary’s County in an existing community clustered around existing amenities. He stressed that it would be illogical not to take advantage of the St. Clements Shores WWTP.

 

Although Commissioner Taylor did not disagree with Dr. Wise’s remarks, he questioned whether they have had the opportunity to present their case before the Planning Commission. Mr. Phillips replied in the negative.

 

Mr. King continued that he expects a Memorandum of Understanding with the BOCC to be signed within the next few weeks, allowing expansion of the Facilities Plan for the 8th and 5th sanitary districts to a County-wide Comprehensive Water & Sewer Plan. He has recommended inclusion of the Compton, Charlotte Hall, and Hollywood areas within the Plan, and has stressed the importance of resolving this issue. In order to further expedite the process, the Golf Course could request the Planning Commission to consider a change in the Water & Sewer Plan.

 

Commissioner Taylor agreed that the issue should be viewed comprehensively; however, the existing problem remains those houses that are in a failed system, versus new construction.

 

Mr. King agreed that this is the most significant issue. He noted that in the event the Commission’s site cannot cope with the additional 16,500 gallons/day required by the Golf Course, a pipe could be run to a drain field area located on the Course, and discharged. However, this does not resolve the issue and it ultimately remains the BOCC’s decision as to whether approval given to the Breton Bay PUD in 1969 is sufficient to allow those properties to be connected without the other properties in Compton. He added that, although there is a piece of land in the vicinity of the treatment plant on which an RIB can be successfully installed, the property owner would first have to permit this. Mr. King stressed at this point that the request would have to originate directly from the Planning Commission and BOCC.

 

Commissioner St. Clair suggested that staff arrange a meeting with the Director of LUGM to present these issues then accompany Golf Course representatives before the Planning Commission to introduce the facts on their behalf.

 

Mr. King noted that when the County proceeds with the new County-wide Comprehensive Water & Sewer Plan, construction of the expansion system into the Compton area from a financial standpoint will now be more feasible as a result of the new capital improvements financing system.

 

He finally agreed that if the Planning Commission decides, prior to approval of the County-wide Comprehensive Water & Sewer Plan, that the circumstances involved in approval of the PUD are sufficient to allow new houses to be built on Breton Bay and connect to the public water system, then MetCom could treat the Golf Course’s wastewater on its site and pump the effluent back to its disposal field.

 

EXECUTIVE SESSION

 

Commissioner Hanson moved to adjourn into Executive Session at 1:45 p.m. to discuss contract and personnel issues.   Commissioner Owen seconded the motion and approval was unanimous.

 

The meeting readjourned into Regular Session at 3:20 p.m.

 

APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES

 

Commissioner Lancaster moved to approve Minutes of Executive Session dated November 15, 2007. Commissioner Hanson seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

Commissioner Lancaster moved to proceed with discussions regarding the Greenview West LLC payment agreement. Commissioner St. Clair seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER’S REPORT

 

Commissioner St. Clair moved to waive the oral presentation by the Chief Financial Officer, and to accept the routine monthly financial reports as submitted and received by this Commission. Commissioner Hanson seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

A. Maryland Local Government Investment Pool (MLGIP)

 

Ms. Shick referred to a letter dated November 30, 2007 from PNC Institutional Investments regarding this issue, and briefly discussed Florida’s local government investment pool freezing withdrawals. She assured the Board that although the MLGIP is not FDIC insured and guaranteed, and the Commission’s specific investments are not collateralized, staff is confident that it is secure.   

 

B. Purchase of Printer

 

Following Ms. Shick’s recommendation, contained in her Memorandum dated December 10, 2007, Commissioner St. Clair moved to amend the FY2008 Operating Budget, as recommended by the Commission’s Chief Financial Officer, to re-allocate $2,277 from the budget expense line for Maintenance Truck 557 ¾ ton 4wd utility body truck, to the budget expense line for Copier with Maintenance Contract for O&M Engineering. This budget amendment has no effect on the Net Income from Service Charges. Commissioner Lancaster seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

 

A.       Proposals for Worker’s Compensation Insurance

 

Ms. Cullins requested approval to accept the November 28, 2007 bid of $42,436 for Worker’s Compensation Insurance from Simm’s Insurance, through Erie Insurance Exchange; effective January 1, 2008 for a three-year term renewable annually.

 

Details of proposals are included in the Purchasing Agents Memorandum dated December 13, 2007, a copy of which is attached to the Minutes.

 

Commissioner St. Clair so moved. Commissioner Owen seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

Ms. Cullins referred the Board’s attention to a letter dated December 7, 2007, addressed to County Commissioner Mattingly, relating to the Singer Group Inc’s Compensation and Classification Study of January 4, 2007; together with a chart illustrating the number of EDU’s served per employee.

 

CHIEF ENGINEER’S REPORT

 

Commissioner St. Clair moved to waive the oral presentation by the Chief Engineer and to accept the routine monthly engineering reports as submitted and reviewed by this Commission. Commissioner Hanson seconded the motion and approval was unanimous.

 

NEW BUSINESS

 

A.       Miss Utility Fee Discussion

 

At County Commissioner Mattingly’s request, Mr. King initiated a discussion on the imposition, as of October 1st, of the Miss Utility relocation fee. He noted that State law allows the Commission to charge fees to companies requesting locates of water/sewer lines, but does not permit the charging of individual property owners. He briefly reviewed Page 6 of the FY2008 budget, which illustrates that the Commission expends approximately $¼ M/year, to perform locates. Up to this point in time, most of these costs are incurred to respond to contractors in accordance with Miss Utility laws, but are being covered by the MetCom’s water and sewer customers. Increasing costs now total a significant amount of money, but the law allows recovery of some of the cost from companies. He further added that no charge is incurred if staff does not find it necessary to mark anything on site. He continued that the Commission is currently still losing approximately $14,000/month, and the issue is whether it is appropriate for its customers to bear this cost, or to begin to charge the contractors who are incurring some of it.

 

Commissioner Mattingly has expressed his concern that charging this fee will discourage contractors from calling in locates, and could possibly result in damage to MetCom’s system and injuries that otherwise would not occur if the contractors did not have to pay the fee.

 

Commissioner Werner requested that staff provide the Board with a breakdown illustrating the difference in cost between Residential/Contractors and Property Owners/Contractors.

 

After further discussion, “Commissioner St. Clair moved that any services contract in place prior to MetCom’s initiation of the commercial Miss Utility Locate Fee shall be exempt from the locate fee if the services contractor can document that its contract was initiated prior to the initiation of the locate fee by MetCom. Further move that any services contract commenced or renewed after the date on which MetCom initiated the Miss Utility Locate Fee shall be subject to the said fee.  Commissioner Lancaster seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

 

B.Fleet Management Out-Sourcing

 

Mr. King referred to a Power Point presentation prepared by Enterprise Fleet Management relating to this issue, a copy of which is attached to the Minutes. He considers that it would benefit MetCom to consider this option from the perspective of minimizing cost of its fleet, purchase/maintenance and eventual sale.

 

In answer to a question from Commissioner St. Clair regarding participation of other counties in the tri-county area in a similar program, Mr. King said that he is not aware of this, but can confidently report that they are not utilizing the services of Enterprise Fleet Management.

 

He continued that staff cannot currently recommend that the contract be either sole sourced or competitively bid; however, if the Board agrees with the concept, then he would say at this point that it is probably more likely that it would be competitively bid. The Board agreed that the issue is worth further investigation. 

 

COMMISSION MEMBERS’ TIME

 

Commissioner Werner questioned the validity of a notice in Wednesday’s issue of the Enterprise stating that water restrictions are still in place. Staff agreed that this is an error, and that Enterprise staff will correct it tomorrow.

 

Mr. King added that the Commission’s Board meeting agendas will now also be included in the Enterprise for publication.

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business, Commissioner Lancaster moved to adjourn at 4:45 p.m. Commissioner St. Clair seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.

                                                         

Lilian J. Bryan, Secretary